5 Email Tips That Can Save Millions of Dollars

Article taken from: http://www.constructionexec.com/Issues/January_2012/Special_Section4.aspx

By Alec Milton

In June 2006, LunchoverIP.com reported 30 countries already had more mobile phones than people. The use of cell phones is especially noticeable in the construction industry, where smartphones are now an essential tool. In addition to the standard functions of calling, texting and emailing, there’s an increase in more sophisticated apps for tasks such as estimating, sourcing materials and viewing drawings.

Smartphones are here to stay, but employees must follow mandated best practices to assure they use them in a way that won’t put the business at risk. Taking security measures to guarantee data cannot be accessed or stolen is important, but a widely overlooked issue with a greater potential of impacting everyday business is email.

Email often is used for time-sensitive exchanges, but it can fall short if the recipient is unavailable or the team is not aware of the communication. It also is used as a written record to be referred to at a later date. However, the unstructured nature of email communication introduces risks. For example, who will know of, or be able to find, project-relevant exchanges if the sender leaves the organization?

Although smartphones are genuine business tools, employees often use company-provided mobile devices for personal communication. Failing to follow company protocol (e.g., forgetting to share an email with the team or keeping a record in a personal email account hidden from colleagues) may simply result in failing to respond in a timely manner. However, failing to meet a deadline or provide evidence when needed can result in huge costs. In the case of Best Buy v. Developer Diversified Realty, the parties argued it would cost in excess of six figures to provide requested email evidence. The judge ignored their pleas and gave them just 28 days to comply. Even Microsoft was ordered to pay $25 million upon failure to provide certain email evidence.

Last March, a lack of documented communication between designers and contractors resulted in a massive installation error at a late stage of a major university project. The settlement, reported to total millions of dollars, was shared by the architect, the MEP engineer and the contractor.

The problem in each case is communication. Solving the problem need not be expensive, but it will prove to be costly if ignored.

“The ability to instantly put your hand on any email not only saves a tremendous amount of time in day-to-day operations, but it also protects you from unfounded litigation. In the construction business, capturing communication is critical to the success of a project and absolutely necessary in order to have full records available for the inevitable disputes that occur in this industry,” says Tony Broomhead, principal and founder of BL Consult. “Too many businesses fail to realize the need for good email filing until it is too late.”

Protecting Against Email Liabilities

  1. Put it in writing. Ensure all important communications are in writing and can be tracked. This can be done via email, text messaging or instant messaging depending on if the company’s system allows users to save and file the content.
  2. Make it transparent. Ensure communications are recorded somewhere accessible to all relevant parties. Instant messaging is great, but only if a record can be kept of each exchange. When using smartphones for email, make sure users adhere to the company’s filing practices.
  3. Structure data. Don’t throw everything in a big bucket. It may provide some peace of mind to have duplicates of every piece of electronic communication in a large unstructured system, but that feeling will evaporate when it’s time to assemble evidence for a trial and someone has to dig through years of data.
  4. File project data together. Organizing and filing messages by project will make communications easy to find during the life of the project and post-construction. File emails alongside other project data so all information is in a logical location and accessible to the entire team.
  5. Implement an intuitive system. Invest in a system that complements the company’s daily workflow. Don’t adopt systems or procedures that are too difficult for employees to use or they likely will circumvent the system. Implement a “touch it once” philosophy: File outgoing electronic messages when they are sent and file incoming messages once they are read.

When searching for the right system, be cautious of cloud-based solutions. Recent outages that hit RIM’s Blackberry devices and Google Docs underline the need for businesses to manage their own data and not rely on a service provider or third-party technology.

In the construction industry, the need to capture electronic communications and mandate best practices for mobile communications is very important to ensure clarity in project communication and efficiency in execution. The industry is particularly litigious, and companies capable of delivering well-documented evidence in a tight time frame have the immediate advantage in court proceedings.

Lawsuits likely will increase as technology allows more options for undocumented or lost communication. Simple day-to-day operational best practices and a solid system for capturing written communications will do far more for a company in court than the most expensive lawyer.

Posted in General, Mail Manager, Press & Reviews

Why Poor Email Management Poses a Legal Risk – WebProNews

by Abby Johnson – WebProNews
http://www.oasys-software.com/mailmanager

Posted in Mail Manager, Press & Reviews

Popular Mechanics: How to Build a Smarter Airport Terminal

Popular Mechanics

Popular Mechanics

Catching a flight on time shouldn’t have to be a frustrating crapshoot. Engineers and architects are using new design technologies to envision better ways to get passengers through an airport terminal, and building new terminals like JetBlue’s T5 at New York’s JFK airport to show what the next generation of airports will look like.

by Adam Hadhazy

Read the full article here.

Jet Blue MassMotion Model

Jet Blue MassMotion Model

Posted in Case Study, Crowd Simulation, MassMotion, Press & Reviews

Hot Mail Manager Press

The Huffington Post

Email Still Essential To Business Owners: Survey Says

Business Insider

Is Your Email Server, Serving Your Needs Or Is It Stifling Your Business

Posted in Mail Manager, Press & Reviews

What’s new in MassMotion 4.5

Having had the fun of beta testing MassMotion 4.5, with the official release I am pleased to say that I can now share that fun with everyone else.

So what is in the new version? Continue reading

Posted in Crowd Simulation, General, MassMotion

Bloomsberg Businessweek – Erin Morrow’s MassMotion Simulates Crowds

Read a recent article in Bloomsberg Businessweek which features MassMotion’s lead developer Erin Morrow.

Bloomsberg Businessweek

Bloomsberg Businessweek

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/erin-morrows-massmotion-simulates-crowds-11172011.html

Posted in Crowd Simulation, General, MassMotion

Converging Crowds by Peter Debney

There has been a suggestion in some quarters that crowds behave like fluids. This may be a useful paradigm when the entire crowd is moving in the same direction down a pipe, sorry, tunnel, but it is rather unrealistic when you examine pedestrian contra flows: you cannot have water moving down a pipe in both directions at once. Fluids, by definition, will also expand to fill the available space, which crowds do not.

In reality, crowds are made up of individuals and small groups that each have their own agendas and destinations. What does happen however in crowds moving in opposite directions is that lanes spontaneously form: people find it easier to follow in the wake of someone going in the same direction.

Having seen some online videos of crowd simulations based on fluid principles, I wondered how a more realistic simulation would deal with the problem of eight crowds simultaneously trying to move from one side of a space to another, a bit like a giant version of Chinese Checkers.

In the first video, the MassMotion pedestrian agents are all set to move at the same speed and you thus get a moderate amount of rotation in the crowd due to the keep-right preference, but is coupled with a steady evaporation around the edges until the central mass reduces to too small a size to be sustained.

In the second video the agents are given a more usual variation in speeds, leading to a more dynamic integration in the mass and what looks rather like turbulence as lanes form.

Helbing in his 2001 paper Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems (Reviews of Modern Physics, 73, 1067-1141) observed that “roundabout” flow patterns emerge at intersections. If we model such an intersection in MassMotion then this is exactly what we see in the analysis:

Intersections

Intersections

This “coriolis effect” indicates that while it is not realistic to model crowds as fluids, there is some fluid-like behaviour that emerges from the individual agents’ movements.

Posted in Crowd Simulation, General, MassMotion

Industry Sales Consultant – New York

Detailed of the role can found here: http://www.oasys-software.com/careers

Posted in General

Two upcoming Mail Manager Webinars

More information and registration links can be found here:

  1. iPhone, Android, Windows Mobile, & BlackBerry users – Tips for organising emails – 14 Sept 2011
  2. Easy centralised configuration with Mail Manager – 21 Sept
Posted in General

New Video Case Studies

We have put together a number of video case studies to showcase some excellent work that our customers have been doing with our software:

Case Study Video Overview - Single Piles

Case Study Video Overview - Single Piles

Case Study Video Overview – Single Piles

A video presentation showcasing some projects that have utilised Alp. AdSec and Pile.


Case Study Video Overview - Frew

Case Study Video Overview - Frew

Case Study Video Overview – Frew

A video presentation showcasing some projects that have utilised Frew.


Case Study Video Overview - Soil Movement

Case Study Video Overview - Soil Movement

Case Study Video Overview – Soil Movement

A video presentation showcasing some projects that have utilised Xdisp, Pdisp and GSA Raft.


Case Study Video Overview - Slope

Case Study Video Overview - Slope

Case Study Video Overview – Slope

A video presentation showcasing some projects that have utilised Slope.


Case Study Video Overview - Safe

Case Study Video Overview - Safe

Case Study Video Overview – Safe

A video presentation showcasing some projects that have utilised Safe.


Posted in Case Study, General, Geotechnical Software, Structural Software