Terms & Conditions

Data Security

We are committed to ensuring that your information is secure. In order to prevent unauthorised access or disclosure we have put in place suitable physical, electronic and managerial procedures to safeguard and secure the information we collect.

All data is stored in secure electronic systems accessible only to Oasys staff with both valid network login credentials and specific authorisation to access the system.  Our systems further limit data access by role to ensure data is available only to those who have a specific need to see it.

If at any point you suspect or receive a suspicious communication from someone suggesting they work for Oasys or a website claiming to be affiliated with Oasys, please forward the communication to us or report the incident by email to [email protected] or in writing to Oasys, 8 Fitzroy Street, London, UK, W1T 4BJ as soon as possible.

Data Security Notice Updated 27th February 2020

top ]


Website Terms and Conditions

The contents of this web site are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights under international conventions. No copying of any words, images, graphic representations or other information contained in this web site is permitted without the prior written permission of the webmaster for this site.

Oasys accepts no responsibility for the content of any external site that links to or from this site.

top ]



Software Licensing Terms

Terms and Conditions of Purchase

The full conditions of purchase and maintenance for all Oasys desktop software are set out in the Oasys Software Licence and Support Agreement.

The full conditions of purchase and maintenance for Oasys Gofer and Oasys Giraphe are set out in the Gofer SaaS Agreement  and the Giraphe SaaS agreement.

All prices are subject to TAX at the current rate.

Prices and specifications are subject to change without notice – please ask for a written quotation.

Although every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of all information contained herein, the contents do not form or constitute a representation, warranty, or part of any contract.

Superseded Versions of Terms and Conditions

Oasys keeps copies of all superseded versions of its terms and conditions.

Maintenance & Support Services

Support and maintenance is included with all subscription licences for their full duration.

Annual maintenance contracts are available for software under a perpetual licence, prices are based on a percentage of the most recent list price.

This service includes:


top ]



Cookies Policies

View available cookies policies below:


top ]


Footfall analysis for Singapore’s Helix Bridge

Software Used on this Project

Project Overview

The elegantly curved 3.5km Helix footbridge with its four cantilevered viewing pods is a focal point of Singapore’s Marina Bay development. Its design, inspired by the double helix of DNA, is so innovative it is an entirely new classification of bridge structure.

While a single helix would untwist when it is loaded, two helices can form a bridge when they run in opposite directions and interconnect by a series of struts and tie rods – reminiscent of the double helix of DNA with its base chemical bridges.  The rods connect the two spirals together and, at the same time, maintain the consistent distance between the spirals. This gives structural strength and stiffness to the bridge, making it a competent structure.

From the outset, the project brief posed several design challenges: the bridge was to be curved to join the foreshore promenades on either side seamlessly; it needed to be lightweight to create visual contrast with a neighbouring 6-lane vehicle bridge; and it had to provide shade and shelter against direct sunshine and heavy rainfall. These factors, together with the desire to create a landmark structure, led to a novel and unique design by architects, the Australian Cox Group and Singapore-based Architects 61,  and presented structural engineers at Arup with an intriguing project.

How Oasys proved invaluable

Vibration analysis

The resonance of structures with low damping levels, such as footbridges, is extremely sensitive to footfall rate. One of the main concerns during the design stage was the risk of lateral synchronous vibration (LSV) – the phenomenon infamously responsible for excessive vibrations felt on London’s Millennium Bridge on opening day. When LSV occurs, pedestrians walking across a bridge progressively lock in step as they attempt to balance themselves laterally. This induces a build-up in vibration on the bridge deck and generates a phenomenon where the level of vibration increases with time. Arup has contributed a substantial amount of research on the topic and recommends that the fundamental frequency for the lateral mode be at least 1.5Hz.

On this bridge, there is also a series of ovular-shaped cantilevered viewing ‘pods’, each with capacity for about 100 people, that extend out on the bay side to create ‘ring-side’ viewing for water events and firework displays. So, footfall and vibration analysis had to consider scenarios when the bridge was crowded to capacity with heavy loads on the one side where all the viewing pods are suspended. Other project specific considerations included thousands of marathon runners crossing the bridge in quick succession, the Singapore Big Walk event, and or the bridge split into running and walking lanes.

The bridge’s dynamic properties were computer simulated and then validated with physical tests on site to confirm that dynamic properties and response generated were within published acceptability criteria.

The soil surrounding the piles is predominantly very soft marine clay so the pile was modelled together with the bridge structure using Strand 7 finite element analysis to take into account the soil–structure interaction effects.

Modal testing

Modal testing ascertained the dynamic properties of the bridge and calculated the critical damping ratio. These tests also investigated the level of vibration that would be generated by small groups of people jumping – such as the behaviour of a jubilant crowd engaged in celebrative events on the bridge. Two mechanical shakers generated vibrations using statistically uncorrelated random signals at varying locations on the bridge spans and on the cantilevered pod areas.

Footfall analysis

Footfall analysis was carried out using Oasys GSA. The GSA footfall analysis assumes a single-person (mass 76kg) excitation approach.  The single-person excitation method compares the predicted level of vibration caused by a single person walking at the most critical footfall rate. Many codes explicitly recognise this as the basis for their code checks, and this method has generally ensured adequate vertical dynamic performance of external footbridges over the last 50 years. Calculations based on single-person excitation at the most critical footfall rate are satisfactory because the probability of more than one person walking at exactly the same speed, footfall rate and phase is extremely low.

Walking vibrations for human comfort are generally measured using response factors (R-factors), ratios between the acceleration from the vibration generated and the threshold of barely perceptible vibration. For example, if the response factor is 2, the vibration is twice that of the barely perceptible vibration level. Weighted factors (from BS 68414) are also generally applied to the accelerations as human perception is more sensitive to particular ranges of frequencies.

The GSA analysis output result is in the form of an R-factor.

Dynamic response

Numerical studies determined the dynamic performance of the bridge, focusing on the vertical response to single, walking pedestrians. A GSA contour plot of the vertical vibration response factor at any point on the bridge deck due to a single person walking is shown in the image slider above (originally numbered 6).

The maximum response expected on the main deck of the footbridge is R = 29. This response is only predicted in the centre of the smaller approach spans. The response of the main spans of the footbridge is expected to be lower, no more than R = 10.

On the viewing decks, it is not possible for people to take more than 20 steps; therefore, only a proportion of the maximum steady-state response can be achieved. The response predicted on the pods by GSA is shown in the image slider above (originally numbered 7). The maximum expected response at the side edge of the viewing deck is R = 32.

The measured vibration levels of the bridge are similar to those predicted, with the exception  of the approach spans, which perform better than predictions.

The ‘real life’ study of vibration due to pedestrian crowd traffic involved around 280 volunteers from the Land Transport Authority who walked, ran, jogged and jumped to order.

Overall, the measured results were found to be in close agreement with the predicted response of the bridge. It was also shown that the level of dynamic response measured was acceptable in accordance with the latest international codes. The Singapore Helix has become a much-admired and much-used and enjoyed feature of the magnificent Marina Bay.

This case study was published in Volume 95 of the Structural Engineer, you can read the article online.
Structural Engineer Magazine 2017

What is your query?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Newsletter Sign up

Please fill out your details below to receive the latest oasys news.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.