Terms & Conditions

Data Security

We are committed to ensuring that your information is secure. In order to prevent unauthorised access or disclosure we have put in place suitable physical, electronic and managerial procedures to safeguard and secure the information we collect.

All data is stored in secure electronic systems accessible only to Oasys staff with both valid network login credentials and specific authorisation to access the system.  Our systems further limit data access by role to ensure data is available only to those who have a specific need to see it.

If at any point you suspect or receive a suspicious communication from someone suggesting they work for Oasys or a website claiming to be affiliated with Oasys, please forward the communication to us or report the incident by email to [email protected] or in writing to Oasys, 8 Fitzroy Street, London, UK, W1T 4BJ as soon as possible.

Data Security Notice Updated 27th February 2020

top ]


Website Terms and Conditions

The contents of this web site are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights under international conventions. No copying of any words, images, graphic representations or other information contained in this web site is permitted without the prior written permission of the webmaster for this site.

Oasys accepts no responsibility for the content of any external site that links to or from this site.

top ]



Software Licensing Terms

Terms and Conditions of Purchase

The full conditions of purchase and maintenance for all Oasys desktop software are set out in the Oasys Software Licence and Support Agreement.

The full conditions of purchase and maintenance for Oasys Gofer and Oasys Giraphe are set out in the Gofer SaaS Agreement  and the Giraphe SaaS agreement.

All prices are subject to TAX at the current rate.

Prices and specifications are subject to change without notice – please ask for a written quotation.

Although every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of all information contained herein, the contents do not form or constitute a representation, warranty, or part of any contract.

Superseded Versions of Terms and Conditions

Oasys keeps copies of all superseded versions of its terms and conditions.

Maintenance & Support Services

Support and maintenance is included with all subscription licences for their full duration.

Annual maintenance contracts are available for software under a perpetual licence, prices are based on a percentage of the most recent list price.

This service includes:


top ]



Cookies Policies

View available cookies policies below:


top ]


2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games

Software Used on this Project

Project Overview

Achieving the ‘Greenest Games Ever’, the Geotechnical Engineers Challenge

The bid to host the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games included a commitment to achieving “the most sustainable games ever”. Despite cost and time constraints the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) had to achieve this goal. As such, the Authority asked geotechnical engineers to adapt many aspects of the design and construction of the Olympic Park to become more sustainable.

This article introduces the general process used to make London 2012 the ‘greenest games ever’ and contains geotechnical case studies showing how even simple designs incorporated sustainable goals.

How Oasys proved invaluable

To keep to their promise, the ODA developed a set of 12 Sustainability Objectives that all their delivery partners were required to implement.

The engineers working on the Olympics had to incorporate the objectives into the designs and the following targets were set to give more specific requirements:

  • 20% by value of reused or recycled construction materials to be used
  • 25% by weight of recycled aggregates to be used (as a proportion of total aggregate)
  • 90% of demolitions materials to be reused and recycled
  • All infrastructure to achieve a CEEQUAL accreditation

The requirement for CEEQUAL accreditation was particularly pertinent as all statements had to be evidence based so designers were required to provide drawings, calculations and meeting minutes and record their actions accordingly.

Reinforced Soil Design

The Olympic Park involved extensive landscaping. A large amount of geotechnical design incorporated reinforced earth design. Splayed reinforced soil design was selected for the bridge abutments, not only for the aesthetic aspects, but for its contribution to ecology. The splayed reinforced soil reduces the Urban Heat Island Effect and provided opportunities for planting and habitat creation.

The strengthened earthworks design also provided opportunities to incorporate sustainability but, for such an extensive site with interweaving rivers, this added to the geotechnical constraints.

The geotechnical design for the strengthened earthworks around bridges and rivers incorporated basal reinforcement and for significant retained heights, the reinforced soil slopes were founded on Vibro Concrete Columns (VCC). Initially 2,700 VCC’s were proposed to satisfy design standards and account for uncertainty in the ground conditions. On-site testing was proposed, which meant that the VCCs needed could be measured precisely. The on-site testing resulted in a significant reduction in the number of VCCs required across the project from 2,700 to 2,000 – saving on average £500 per unit and delivering significant time savings on the construction programme.

Engineers also used Oasys Slope to assess slope stability. Oasys Slope enabled easy incorporation of basal reinforcement into the design of slopes and the ability to assess the risk of flooding to the slopes. The design guidance also allowed for the departure from standard materials such as Class 6I fill to cater for the target to re-use material. Consequently, where polymer geogrids were used for shallow slopes, materials from on site fill sources were considered and it was critical to assess the impact of these materials on the slope stability of the proposed strengthened earthworks.

Understanding the geometry of the site was also critical. A number of cross sections were considered for each slope to assess the extent of VCCs, basal reinforcement and the suitability of on site fill instead of standard reinforced earth fill.

Integral Bridge Design

Bridges with integral abutments are characterised by two major advantages; firstly that expansion joints and bearings are omitted, reducing the maintenance and whole life cost of the bridge and secondly that the superstructure is restraint at the end supports, such that end moments counteracting to the field moments leads to bridges with a small construction height. This saves on material, meeting a crucial requirement for sustainability.

However, the geotechnical analysis of integral bridge abutments is not straightforward. The soil, embankments, abutments, piers and bridge deck must all be considered as one compliant system and this presents a challenge for load distribution calculations.  An important aspect of integral bridge design is the modelling of the soil-structure interaction. For abutments with vertical piles and particularly those with only a single row, shortening of the superstructure due to creep and shrinkage and movements arising from traction forces, induce bending moments which are directly related to the combined stiffness of the pile and the surrounding soil. To calculate bending moments in the piles, the stiffness of the soil must be included.

The Engineers needed to use a simple method of analysing the soil-structure interaction to identify the effect and sensitivity of critical design parameters and to quickly develop a variety of options. The level of design should enable the most suitable scheme to be identified and then taken through approvals and detailed design.

The analysis of soil structure interaction needed to address several different loading conditions, each of which can have a critical effect on the integral bridge and involve the interaction of deck movements (displacements and/or rotations) and the soil resistance on the back of the abutment.

These can be summarised as:

  • Deck rotation due to vehicle loads resisted by soil stiffness behind abutment.
  • Increased long-term soil pressure due to deck expansion/thermal ratcheting.
  • Thermal contraction and reduced soil pressures.
  • Breaking loads resisted by soil pressure.

Oasys Frew was used with guidance from BA 42/96 to quickly and conservatively analyse the complex problem. The design experience gleaned from the Olympic Park Project was used to further develop Oasys Frew, which now incorporates integral bridge design.


The Olympic Park design was an opportunity to showcase innovation and to set a new sustainability bar for the designers. The examples discussed show how research, cutting edge analysis and exemplary design deliver sustainable results. The following quote demonstrates how the impact of the engineers on sustainable design has left a legacy.

“Setting the bar high means that this level of design will need to be sustained by Geotechnical Engineers in the future”.

What is your query?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Newsletter Sign up

Please fill out your details below to receive the latest oasys news.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.