Read a recent article in Bloomsberg Businessweek which features MassMotion’s lead developer Erin Morrow.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/erin-morrows-massmotion-simulates-crowds-11172011.html
Read a recent article in Bloomsberg Businessweek which features MassMotion’s lead developer Erin Morrow.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/erin-morrows-massmotion-simulates-crowds-11172011.html
There has been a suggestion in some quarters that crowds behave like fluids. This may be a useful paradigm when the entire crowd is moving in the same direction down a pipe, sorry, tunnel, but it is rather unrealistic when you examine pedestrian contra flows: you cannot have water moving down a pipe in both directions at once. Fluids, by definition, will also expand to fill the available space, which crowds do not.
In reality, crowds are made up of individuals and small groups that each have their own agendas and destinations. What does happen however in crowds moving in opposite directions is that lanes spontaneously form: people find it easier to follow in the wake of someone going in the same direction.
Having seen some online videos of crowd simulations based on fluid principles, I wondered how a more realistic simulation would deal with the problem of eight crowds simultaneously trying to move from one side of a space to another, a bit like a giant version of Chinese Checkers.
In the first video, the MassMotion pedestrian agents are all set to move at the same speed and you thus get a moderate amount of rotation in the crowd due to the keep-right preference, but is coupled with a steady evaporation around the edges until the central mass reduces to too small a size to be sustained.
In the second video the agents are given a more usual variation in speeds, leading to a more dynamic integration in the mass and what looks rather like turbulence as lanes form.
Helbing in his 2001 paper Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems (Reviews of Modern Physics, 73, 1067-1141) observed that “roundabout” flow patterns emerge at intersections. If we model such an intersection in MassMotion then this is exactly what we see in the analysis:
This “coriolis effect” indicates that while it is not realistic to model crowds as fluids, there is some fluid-like behaviour that emerges from the individual agents’ movements.
Detailed of the role can found here: http://www.oasys-software.com/careers
We have put together a number of video case studies to showcase some excellent work that our customers have been doing with our software:
A video presentation showcasing some projects that have utilised Alp. AdSec and Pile.
A video presentation showcasing some projects that have utilised Frew.
A video presentation showcasing some projects that have utilised Xdisp, Pdisp and GSA Raft.
A video presentation showcasing some projects that have utilised Slope.
A video presentation showcasing some projects that have utilised Safe.
The Copenhagen Metro Circle Line consists of a 15.5km metro line with 17 underground stations. The stations are constructed as cut-&-cover structures using top-down construction technique and retained within a station box of either secant piles or diaphragm walls. The settlement analysis was undertaken using Oasys Xdisp.
View the whole case study here:Â http://www.oasys-software.com/casestudies?id=57/
Really nice review of MassMotion in the latest edition of AEC Magazine.
http://aecmag.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=445&Itemid=32
MassMotion product director Erin Morrow, chats with Ralph Grabowski about the ideas behind the software and why it is so fast and accurate. Read the article here.
Sarah C. Kaethner, BSc, CEng, MIStructE – Arup
Frances Yang, MEng, PE State of CA, LEED® AP – Arup
Structural engineers need to understand the environmental impact of their designs. This paper describes a project undertaken to review the confusing array of data and provide an approach which links data, tools and real-life material specification. The aim was to find a method of presenting environmental impacts alongside other design parameters, such as strength, so that these issues can be considered as a normal part of the design process. Environmental impact factors have been reviewed from international sources for a set of structural materials. A methodology for presenting the range of values for unreinforced concrete was developed using practice guidelines. Default data was developed to familiarise engineers with the relative impacts of materials and lead them to mitigation strategies through specification and further exploration of the issues. This data is for inclusion in structural software programs Oasys AdSec and GSA so that embodied impacts are reported alongside other structural design parameters. Because the software offers design options for different codes of practice in different countries, impact values for different countries were also needed.
Read the full article here (as reproduced from The Structural Engineer 5th July 2011)
View a video from Natasha Stilllwell reporting on London’s Olympic Aquatics Centre
Natasha Stillwell’s report for Discovery Channel Canada on the engineering of London’s new Olympic Aquatics Centre.